Evening Sky at Oxford University Parks, Fall 2003





<< January 2012 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31



THIS BLOG CONTAINS CHINESE
You may need to
change your Encoding
to Chinese Simplified (GB)
then Refresh

Previously tausarpiah
and the earlier entries
first appeared here

My Bloginality is ISFJ!!!

ICQ: 36687725
MSN: tausarpiah@yahoo.com.sg

My Photos
NEW pix from GREECE!

people we're allowed to see
l.z.y./Data
what just happened to hao
Chin Lum's homepage
Darius
David djourne
The Bigwig
fongming's Randomtots
Canuf's, all Canuf's!!!
The Rong Story
Simply Shawn
Toi Ngee's Words
yanxi perpetually dreamin'
chuan's toes
Zhimin
antics of degoon

news we're allowed to read
BBCi
CNNi
The Straits Times
"allowed to read" in every sense
Lianhe Zaobao 联合早报
This too ...
ChannelNewsAsia
And this too
The Guardian
ETToday Taiwan 东森新闻
New York Times
subscription req'd
The Economist
subscription req'd too
MSN Slate
Salon

politics we're allowed to participate
Feedback Unit S'pore
BBC UK Politics
Yahoo! US Politics
ETToday Taiwan Politics
Singapore Politics
paiseh ...

music we're allowed to hear
BoxUp Music
Taiwan G-Music 台湾风云榜
MTV Chinese 封神榜
Singapore Symphony Orchestra
London Symphony Orchestra
London Philharmonic
Philharmonia Orchestra
Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra
Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra

places we're allowed to go
University of Oxford
Esplanade






Contact Me

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:


rss feed


Tuesday, October 26, 2004
Really moving

It's hard to have two postings every posting ... haha
So I'm really moving to David's and this will be backup.
So, haha Zun, can update your bookmark! ;)

wows wonders at 10/26/2004 6:08:52 pm

wonder with wows

Wednesday, October 20, 2004
Taiwan's FM PCC, Singapore's LP kia buay ki

I was just on Sintercom (oh no don't arrest me for treason), and I read this kinda half-witty half-boring column about Taiwan's FM. Left a little comment there.

I don't know what the response in Singapore is like. Apparently my mom and Data didn't know that such a thing actually happened until quite late in the day, when Mark Chen had already apologised. I knew cos' I read Taiwan news and was wondering what the hell was happening. Then my Taiwan flatmate came laughing and asked whether I knew that my country had been called a PLP and a pisai by their dear FM. To which my retort was "yah, so we are pisai, then you are what? "cong zhongguo na ge sai kang fang chulai de gow sai" (樃拞崙撨槩乬洕岴乭曻弌棃揑乬嬬洕乭乯, i.e. a piece of dog poo ejected from the a*s*hole that is China ... well of course this was all in the spirit of humour and my obvious anger at being thus treated by a country as misled as Taiwan. It was all cool.

And then later I thought, how uncivilised that reply was, that kinda just made me the same as the Mark Chen. So this is first and foremost a philosophical question - was that right or wrong? Remember those arguments about how Kerry should not go negative about Bush ... well I think that is crap. The Democrats should be negative, they should tear Bush apart, and then build upon that rotten ash that is sitting on the ground. Those bo ji Democrats.

Then it became a question of the specifics - who these Taiwanese were. And after reading lots of stuff on the web about how Taiwanese reacted diametrically differently in gadzillions of ways to the incident (including some who authoritatively claimed that since Zhuangzi could use human anatomy to describe all sorts of things, why couldn't Mark Chen ...), I've concluded that what Singapore, or what MFA, or what I say is besides the point. The facts are clear. Yes, we are a piece of pisai, a bloody piece that I perhaps just dug out of my bleeding nose if I may add (if not why little red dot). But hey, we are a pisai with a GDP that's larger than the combined GDP of 2/3 of the number of countries with whom Taiwan has diplomatic relations.

And we are also a piece of pisai that at least is ... erm ... not kinda facing daily identity crises. So, perhaps our collective LPs and collective balls would have been exceptionally "song" if MFA had rebutted them, but it's not gonna do anything for our image overseas ... i.e. that respectable image that has Goh Chok Tong playing golf with Bill Clinton (I may add, please A-bian it's not the end of the world if you can't meet the President of the USA, don't cry, don't scream the next time you get on stage you poor boy).

And so we are a piece of pisai, but at least when we say "forget about it" when we encounter labels on our country ... we could, in a way. Once in a while we will make sardonic jokes and deprecating remarks about us being little red dot. That's at least better than some state/country/whatever who cannot "forget about it" cos' they plunge into this crisis about "who are we who are we state country or province?". Taiwan can't forget about their daily existential dilemmas, and perhaps we could forgive them for their desperate attempts at distracting themselves.

wows wonders at 10/20/2004 11:54:22 pm

wonder with wows

Exam Questions

The guy who teaches China and IR, a Dr Russell Ong, kinda sucks. First, he looks and sounds Singaporean. Second, he has the same surname as me, which makes him even more suspiciously Singaporean. And third, he gives boring lectures, filled with "you know" ... e.g. "China was not happy, you know" ... that kind. I counted 233 you know's in a one hour lecture. And then finally, he keeps talking about exam questions. GOSH! It's as though I got teleported to Singapore!

But I was due to do the first presentation for International Politics of Asia, about Chinese nationalism, and he let out the usual refrain ... "search for a past year exam question and answer a question". I was irritated, but then, towards the end of that day, I refound my senses.

Answering questions isn't such a bad thing. Isn't that the whole idea? I have always learnt through essay questions ... was I dreaming that those weren't some kind of past year questions? Perhaps if he had said "essay questions" instead of "exam questions" it wouldn't have sounded so irritating. But it's true that questions focus and trigger thought. If I didn't think about answering questions as best as I could, I probably would not have honed many of the argumentative writing skills I now know that I didn't know as late as Sec 4. I remember Kenneth Lee and his emphasis on preparing for any inquiry with "essay outlines".

And then, Niall Ferguson, whose writing and teaching of which of course I'm a big fan, reinforced this thinking. Why didn't I recall that he starts every book of his asking 10-12 questions he would systematically answer in his book? That was fabulous. He says that he does it out of love for Oxford tutorials and the training that gave him. It is brilliant how out of 10 seemingly discrete questions arise books that make coherent sense.

What can I say? Open that .pdf file to grab that essay question for my presentation ...

wows wonders at 10/20/2004 12:43:00 am

wonder with wows

Tuesday, October 19, 2004
What's been happening

Was just having a conversation in Data yesterday when I realise that reading this blog I would have thought I was still in Beijing and was (impossibly) watching presidential debates next to Tian'anmen or something ...

Thing is, I'm in London, and I'm reminded everyday by the rain (okay, these two days have been good, yesterday was exceptionally bright, sunny ... cold ... ok let's not go on). And the thing also is, that until recently I did not have a reliable inhouse Internet service. In fact even now it's not so reliable, but my downloading speed reached a magical 150KB today. Erm, it's all relative aint it, since when did 150KB become magical ...

The other thing that was happening is, I was moving my blog. I am moving my blog (I notice a tense situation in the last ten words) ... after half a year here at Blogdrive. It has got better and better, and I hate to go. But I hate to turn down djourne's repeated invitations ... So, as Data quips, "media consolidation proceeds apace". For a little while I will be double posting, while I move everything over, and while the two people who read my blog update their bookmarks to http://tausarpiah.djourne.net.

I hope to move everything over by Nov 2nd, in time for my planned (and a million others have also planned) live-blogging of the elections in USA, since I've got CNN in my room (!! I hope TV Licensing hasn't resorted to ransacking blogs ...) ... but till then ... it will be as confusing as Iraq and US opinion polls ...

wows wonders at 10/19/2004 4:55:55 pm

1 wondered with wows

Friday, October 15, 2004
"What is the government's view of Beckham's captainship?"

So it's BBC Question Time, and somebody actually gets to ask whether the panel thinks Beckham should stay on as England captain ...! And the answers are real witty.

David Dimbleby: "So what's the government's view of Beckham?"

Labour MP from England: "He's made a mistake, he's said sorry, he should stay. And he's a great footballer, he's one of the lads, yet he's a great father."

Lib Dem MP from Wales: "He's said sorry,  I mean, pity that guy, that's the only way England can beat Wales."

Tory MP from Scotland: "I support the Scottish team. But we need to support Beckham cos' he's been really professional, and being a great father."

And finally, the Press calls for his resignation. As usual.

wows wonders at 10/15/2004 1:13:23 am

wonder with wows

Thursday, October 14, 2004
The Third Presidential De .. .Talkfest

[Condensing 9 entries into 1]

Isn't this supposed to be about domestic issues?

That is such a weird first question~! Will we ever be safe and secure again?

"The measure is not whether we are safer, the measure is whether we are as safe as we ought to be."

The moderator chose a very bad question. It's back to foreign policy, and it's so weird ...

"Yes we can be safe, if we go on the offense against terror, and if we spread freedom and liberty around the world"

4 years ago I never dreamt a Republican President would say that. Pat Buchanan is fainting at home as I type. Bush points out the terrorism is a nuisance remark.

I see what this is about. This is about homeland security.

Bush: "I don't think I ever said I don't worry about Osama bin Laden. It's one of those .... exaggerations *pained expression*" A very cute expression. Very effective. I liked it. Kerry should adopt it everytime Bush says he's a flip flop haha.


Bush is doing so well!


Bush is so cute when answering about flu shot. "If you're young, if you're healthy, don't get a flu shot this year!" Kerry has to be very careful answering this. After all, the problem comes partly from overseas. Oh dear, Bush is now being very deliberate in his answers ... sounds like regurgitation.

Kerry's turn. It's a challenge for him to talk about and to the families, rather than to academics. And he's not really answering the question. I'm not sure this is appropriate. But anyway Bob Schiefer has really weird questions. It's like a tricky oral exam.

Bush: "I want to remind people that a plan is not a litany of complaints." Excellent! Who taught him that?! Excellent!


Kerry has a bad start, Bush has a bad drawl ...

It's not going well for Kerry so far. His replies seem unfocussed. Perhaps the pressure of expectations has got to him. Bush probably knows he can't answer that well head on, so he goes back to the record. Betcha Tony Blair taught him something about digging up dirty things about Michael Howard. BUT WHY DOES BUSH HAS A DRAWL!? It makes him irritating even when he is talking sense.

Bush is doing very well. He's talking straight. The only way Kerry can turn this around is to use humour. Oh he's brilliant. I'm so impressed!

Kerry is coming back. He's had a bad start. He's in his element on jobs. Talking straighter, using a little humour. He needs to relax. Looks much better when he's relaxed.


That arrogant Bush

Bush has one major advantage over Kerry, he knows how to talk to ordinary people. But sometimes he pushes that advantage too far and appears quite arrogant. I don't understand how he thinks that can be appealing. Oh no, he is going overboard, really.


"I sure hope it's not the Administration!"

Kerry still seems a little uncomfortable talking about his faith. But I think he was quite good on that. His previous comments on abortion were terrible. He must do better.

Oh, DUBYA IS SO FUNNY! "Gosh I sure hope it's not the Administration('s fault that healthcare costs are so high) *chuckle*" Hahah!!! I think the Democrats are really breaking out in cold sweat.

Kerry is finally talking straighter and talking about his plan, instead of waffling rambling and complaining. That's good. And it's especially on an issue on diabetes.

Bush once again tries to trash Kerry. It was half successful, if only he had completed it ... I thought he was gonna talk straight to the people, but instead he quotes another report ... WHY?! Just kinda invalidated what you said earlier. Govt-run health care is poorer quality healthcare, Bush says. I'm sure a lot of Brits agree. Well, except that Kerry's is not govt-run ... hmmmz ... impressions matter don't they?


Why is Bush chuckling at email?!

On to social security ... It's a lot about fiscal discipline, so we'll see what happens.

Oh Kerry brilliantly related everything to jobs and fiscal policy. And then Bush tries to fool the middle class that their tax cuts are "more" than the upper class. Well yes, the total amount is more, but I betcha if I was middle class I lost more money.

WHY DOES BUSH KEEP CHUCKLING!? Especially at email!!! Why? Does he think getting email is very funny?! Now I'm offended. Wonder what he thinks of blogging. Oh does he know what's blogging, considering he called it "Internets"

I don't know much about immigration and border security, so I'm not gonna comment.


The Kerry Moment

Oooh minimum wage. Oh, this must be the Kerry moment. It was good, straight, and compelling. If he had only added "I'm tired of all the talk about family values without valuing families. I'm gonna do something." I was gonna say he needs to work on convincing people, but then again this is the last debate.

Okay, Bush is back onto education. I'm not so sure that works actually. I mean it's rational and it makes sense. But will the American buy it ...? It's time for Kerry to first push his point again across and point out the Bush is evading the qeustion, and to talk about education.

I realise that Kerry consistently does his homework on the home state he is in. Just a note. Don't know whether people take notice.

.... err sorry Mr President, but what's so liberal about saying 49% increase in education spending is not enough ...? Gosh, such a blatant label-for-the-sake-of-labelling.

And Kerry just broke the rules by speaking to the President directly ... haha. But it's a good time to do it.


URGH! It's a war! Get serious!

ARGH! MR PRESIDENT! WHY ARE YOU HAVING THAT BLAIRITE CHEESY GRIN WHEN KERRY IS TALKING ABOUT A WAR?!

Oh gosh, I know why he's grinning. He's thinking "HAHA Kerry is talking about war, now I'm gonna use the global test quote he said taht day yay!". First the "nuisance", then the "global test". Kerry MUST COME OUT STRONGLY TO REBUT THIS! For heavens sake. Oh okay he did it. And he appealed to common sense. Kerry is much better at being dismissive and cocky than Bush. Bush is just a little too scripted with his words and with his behaviour. Kerry is more Presidential.

CAN THE MODERATOR STOP ASKING FOREIGN POLICY QUESTIONS!? I can't imagine the MODERATOR breaking the rules ... Doesn't he understand I'm not prepared today to blog foreign policy?!

"We have won where Bill Clinton won." Oh yes, except that Clinton's foreign policy is ambivalent for Americans.


Every question an education question

Bush's "stroke" today is to turn every question into an education question. Jobs, minimum wage, affirmative action ... all come down to education. That's a very sound stand, but that's not answering the question.

I think the environmentalists are gonna boycott Bill Schiefer from today onwards. No question on the environment.

And now a question on faith. Kerry gets a second chance. Don't trash Bush please. Talk personally.

Bush talks well about faith. BUT, to call the army in Iraq "an army of compassion" is a little pushing it aint it ...

And here's the champion. Kerry turns a faith question into an education question!!! Oh my word. This is amazing. Okay then he comes back.


A good second last, an interesting last.

So much for trashing the moderator, this is a very good last question. And Kerry gave a good answer. On to Bush, and he really has a Texas record on that so he was credible 4 years ago. Notice Kerry brings up McCain and Bush brings up Ted Kennedy. Interesting. Except that "Bush can mention John McCain is for me as President" and make it sound good, Kerry can't say Kennedy ...

Now the wives questions ...

BUSH IS EXCELLENT AT SELF-DEPRECATING HUMOUR! "To stand up and not scowl"?! Haha oh gosh that's so funny. "She's speaking much better than I do, I mean people understand what she's saying." Oh good good comeback for Bush.

KERRY IS FUNNY TOO! "I think we all married up, maybe me more than the two of you." But he talked about his mother. Integrity, integrity, integrity. He should have poked more fun at himself for his ... self-absorption ... haha.

Why did I just KNOW that Kerry was gonna go "My felloow Americans". It's so important for somebody who wants to convince people to vote for him. It's an appropriate speech for the conclusion of the debates. Bush would do well if he repeats his convention performance. Hmmz, an ambivalent note. Do everybody believe spreading liberty is the best way to go forward?



Overall. Bush started really strong, and Kerry regained his focus later. Kerry was very strong in the middle, and Bush kinda faltered. But Bush came back. Overall this is a very unfocussed debate, but both did very well. It wasn't about anybody in particular. Nobody turned anybody around. Nobody talked about too many details. It's all very mixed. I think it was a pity nobody talked about environmentalism, and nothing about stem cell research. Kerry still has a slight edge, I think.

wows wonders at 10/14/2004 3:23:06 am

wonder with wows

Tuesday, October 12, 2004
What is History? Ask God.

There is a cottage industry in history writing occupied by those who persistently try to prove the Bible true or otherwise. Got an email from xand which suggests he has in his little way joined that bandwagon. My only encounter with investigative history was Jonathan Spence's Treason by the Book, aout the Lu Liuliang scandal during the Yongzheng and Qianlong eras. Problem with applying that to Christian history is that it is almost invariably controversial. Religion is such a hot potato, I admire anybody who even dares to involve himself with truth and myth in that field. Maybe their prayers told them something ...

wows wonders at 10/12/2004 11:21:36 pm

wonder with wows

Saturday, October 09, 2004
The Second Presidential Debate 2004

[I've decided to condense 14 entries into 1]

Gonna start liveblogging now 1/3 into the debate

Kerry had a good reply about winning the peace being the job of the President, winning the war being the job of the  generals, and Bush looked really constipated trying to restrain his looks.

So far Bush has been doing far better than behind a rostrum, but he still speaks with a drawl that reminds me of "itz so simple, why dun you get it ... (i dun quite get it, but why dun u?) ..."

*

Then Kerry makes a gaffe ".... Iraq ... wasn't a threat"

*WHAT?* ... do Americans buy that?

*

Kerry should stop naming so many generals, and instead talk about what he's gonna do about the war on terror ...

*

Oh Senator, what a sly turn from homeland security to tax plans and healthcare ... but unfortunately it sounds totally irrelevant.

This whole homeland security sounds like a rehash from the first debate. Oh there comes the hurting senate record business. Kerry still hasn't replied to that. Instead Kerry looks bored ...

"I don't think my opponent has the right view of the world to succeed in Iraq" .... ooooh Bush saying that harks back to his "I KNOW about the world" comment in the first debate ...

"The test is not if you've added money, the test is if you've done the things ..." OH HAHA try telling that to Tony Blair who lurrrrvves harping on "we've put XXXX pounds into health, education ..."

"I worry, I worry, I worry" ... sometimes you wonder what he's worried about, Bush ...

*

Domestic Policy - Prescription Drugs

"Looks like it's from Canada, might be from the 3W" ... another reason why Canadians dun like Bush ...

Bush "I went to Washington to fix problems" ... oh and to create some as well I guess?

Kerry has another weird reply. Just PUSH THE FLIP FLOP TO BUSH! Why doesn't he ever do that?

Instead Kerry goes on the favourite Democrat interest groups ladida issue ... Oh no the "fighting for the middle class" sounds so fake ...

Now ... on to the budget ...

*

"We did something you didn't know how to do, we balanced the budget".

Ouch.

Why is Kerry so a little jittery on healthcare ... should be his pet issue aint it? Or was he caught out by the way the question was cut in ... from the perspective of his choice of running mate ...? Or was it cos' he was talking about johnkerry.com HAHA

Oh no why is Bush going on the negative?? It makes him sound really bitter ... Wrong move ... And then he proceeds to use "liberal" OH WHY? Who taught him to do that ... terrible. But maybe labels still work these days.

*

Bush is now trotting out his pet issues. He's trying to portray himself as a war president. I think itz a good thing he's talking on the level of like my mother. I can understand him very well.

Except when he says "we're working together". With who? errrr ....

Oh gosh why is Kerry stumbling and stumbling ...

Bush "Look at the budget" ... again that drawl ... why ... does everybody look at the budget?!

Kerry's reply on tax ... was a little wasted. Started pretty well in the camera... then got a little dragged into detail. Needs to work on that. But the final touch was good, "the President, me, and i'm sorry, you Charlie" ... taking a leaf out of CLinton's "I get a tax cut?! I don't want a tax cut."

That's very smart of Bush to use the phrase "tax rise" ... in effect that's what's gonna happen to the >200,000 earners.

Bush wants to tackle Kerry on his record. Kerry takes the most sensible route, and takes the collective record of his potential Administration and the Clintonesque team. Kerry should implicitly attack Bush's team. Looking at Bush alone, he's going nowhere. He can hardly touch Bush effectively ...

*

Oh NO! Bush totally CANNOT MAKE IT ON ENVIRONMENT POLICY! ... oh no ... this is bad ... oh *cringe*
"I guess you'd say ... I'm a good steward of the land" Oh I'm so cringing.

Bush quite effectively uses the "please Europe". Kerry rebutted quite well, based on the work on international negotiations.

And we have the answer why Kerry's always not in the Senate, cos' he was in Kyoto, in UN, in Vietnam ... in etc. etc. etc. ... anyehere, not Washington D.C.

*

What's this nonsense about a timber company coming out from Kerry?! Weird ... he probably means oil company.

But here comes the Patriot Act ...

*

Oh I thought it was about the Patriot Act, until Bush turned it into a law-and-order answer ... errr you don't need the Patriot Act to do those stuff you know ... what a sly diversion.

Kerry said it ... That's a good reply.

And now here comes stem cells. The press aren't lying about the hot issues man ... Or issit just the selection of the questions.

*

We all now anticipate Bush's Christian lines, since Kerry didn't use them ...

Okay, they didn't appear. But both candidates look competent on this subject. Kerry looked like he wanted to crush Bush or something.

So we move on to the Supreme Court. That was a good reply by Bush ... "I'm not telling". I mean who the hell would tell?! And then he proceeds to dodge the question. Maybe he should say I will appoint judges who will win Florida for me haha.

Bush "The Constitution says you know ... it doesn't SAY THAT" WOW! Oh gosh!!!!!!

Kerry should have said I will appoint judges who will win America for me ... Oh wait, I can't appoint until I've won America. Oh shit ... Okay I'm bullshitting.

And actually Kerry and Bush both have bad answers. I don't understand why Kerry somehow sounds better ...

*

Abortion. Good old issue.

Kerry's answer was terrible. Or rather it descended into terrible-ness. He still needs to work on that...

Oh wow. This is amazing. The abortion debate shows in essence the difference between Bush and Kerry. Bush just thinks "it's just yes or no", Kerry thinks itz not as simple as that ... It's almost the supreme curiosity of mine is this race how American will respond to this difference.

And finally, here comes the very good question about whether Bush thinks he's done anything wrong. Of course everybody remembers that infamous Iraq press conference. And he just took the Tony Blair line about how the ISG report confirms the justification ... totally untenable in UK and triggered Hewitt's apology, how will it go down in USA ...?? dunno ...? I thought Bush had a good question.

Kerry would want to conclude on Iraq. He wants to strike home on others' home ground. Kerry rebutted well finally.

Let's now have closing statements.

*

At the first debate Kerry crushed Bush at the closing statement. Kerry kept up his standard of his first debate closing debate. Bush also kept up his standard, his standard at the Republican convention. Good conclusions ... I thought this was much closer than the first debate, but I still think Kerry has the slight edge ... On the other hand, Bush must be relieved ...

wows wonders at 10/9/2004 3:33:41 am

wonder with wows

Tuesday, September 14, 2004
Students can make up their own mind

Dear Editor,
 
On this page, on Sep 3, three school students responded to a call to ban homework and CCAs on weekends, giving what I think were clear, sensible reasons as to why they would rather not have such a ban. Then on Sep 13, two adults wrote here to bemoan how it was a "sad thing" students want to go back to school on Saturdays, one of them claiming the students were "indoctrinated". I think the latter writers have missed the point. In our society's current collective brainstorm over the way to go for education, we need to think hard about certain fundamental issues, of which I shall highlight three.
 
Firstly, some of us seem to have a cliched perception that our kids can learn better outside school. I think this has resulted in a schizophrenia to both characterise our schools as places where somehow good learning does not take place, and yet at the same time goad our schools to change fast and change dramatically. Besides the fact that this is not too fair to the many dedicated and adaptable people in the education service, it encourages a misperception that school is necessarily "bad". I think we as a society need to revisit the strengths of our schools. They do provide a relatively rigorous education compared to many of the education systems critics of our system love to cite, Western or not. We now agree that that by itself is insufficient for a well-rounded education aimed at nurturing creators, but I do not think we want to veer in the other direction, where we have lots of "creators" who are not "learned". Kids cannot create in a vacuum. We should concentrate on how to build on our schools' current strengths, instead of pretending that they have none. What were we doing in the past three decades otherwise?
 
Secondly, this tendency to disparage our schools may have indirectly resulted in this current debate conflating homework and CCAs, two very different aspects of education. (After all, both must be bad if everything about school is bad.) Their difference can hardly be overemphasised. Perhaps we should consider weekend homework and weekend CCAs as two different questions. I am sure many of our parents know that some of their kids may neglect their homework and hate it all, but give their heart and soul to their CCA out of love for their activity or their mates, and vice versa. We want to encourage diversity in our education, and part of the process involves carefully giving different aspects of education their due individual consideration. These are issues worth more subtle debate.
 
Finally - and this is perhaps most important - I hope the two adults' "alarm" was temporary and I hope they see some irony in what they say, because they seem to be alarmed by the fact that some students have said something that is not in sync with the adults' own mindsets. I think it is wrong to assume that all kids hate school, hate CCA, and desperately want more free time at home. A lot of students in school may want their Saturday free, and some of them will spend quality time with family, meet up with other friends outside school, or play football in the neighbourhood. Some of them might have to go for enrichment, tuition, music, ballet, art classes and so on to enrich themselves. But I suspect a good many other kids want to be involved in school, do things with their friends, and not laze at home anyway. They may want to enjoy the satisfaction of performing well in the SYF competitions with their fellow bandmates, they may want to spend more time training in the facilities provided by schools, perhaps in awe of our Olympic sportspeople, they may want to tinker with experiments that they do not have time for otherwise, or they may just want to perfect their drills in the morning rather than the afternoon sun. And who is anybody to stop anybody else from living their preference? Some may find life outside school more fulfilling, some may think their school-life, CCAs and all, gives them all their fulfilment. We should teach our kids to make informed decisions, guide them to learn in as many ways as possible, and then leave them to make mature, rational choices. It is absolutely fundamental that none of us in society characterise their preferences as "sad" or "indoctrinated" out of hand because they do not fit with our own prejudices and without understanding why they want what they want. Otherwise we are not moving forward and away from a top-down society, only veering to a mirror image of what we used to do. I wonder whether Mdm Malathy consulted her son about whether he prefers going to CCA or having breakfast on a Saturday instead of Sunday. I wonder whether Mr Ho sees some may feel their judgement has been insulted by his letter. I think our system must educate our youth to be able to make sound and reasoned choices. When we have a system that guides them to do so, understands what they want, then respects their freedom and preferences because they are informed and rational, we can make a big step towards a system that our youths respect and yearn to stay in and be part of.

wows wonders at 9/14/2004 3:30:55 pm

3 wondered with wows

Tuesday, September 07, 2004
W is for Wrong, but isn't Clinton wrong too?

It's not the first time Clinton is in hospital, but this time I suspect it's really got to him. AP reports that

Clinton and Kerry spoke for 90 minutes, according to the New York Times, and the former president told Kerry to move away from talking about his Vietnam war record and instead attack Bush on job creation and health care.

Let's just say that I think there are few people that I have come across who are able to frame political campaigns publicly as well as Bill Clinton. If he was campaigning for President, I believe he would be a kickass candidate that would be leading by at least 5 or more points in the polls now.

But, reading the report (or the supposed reports of the conversation), is that the right way to go?! I agree that it's high time Kerry move on from Vietnam and get on with the election, but somehow I don't think jobs and healthcare are earth-shattering election-deciding issues. Well of course I may be wrong. But I'm tempted to think that while W is for wrong, W is also for war.

So how can Clinton be wrong? I think he has narrowed in on the wrong key message for the campaign. But the thrust of his message is correct, that the Kerry campaign needs to "sharpen" or refocus its campaign. It's time for the Democrats to go out and compellingly lay out an alternative vision of running their national and our global security. I just don't understand what's stopping them from offering a clear alternative and a clear choice when it's clear that that's the way to win elections - as proven by Kennedy, Johnson, Carter and Reagan. Gosh ... anybody on the street knows ...

wows wonders at 9/7/2004 2:37:50 am

wonder with wows

Next Page